She is one of the most popular conservative podcasters in America today.
But she hasn’t always been solid on one key issue.
And this popular conservative podcaster just made one admission that shocked her audience.
Allie Beth Stuckey is one of the most popular conservative podcasters in the nation.
Allie Beth Stuckey used to be pro-choice — without realizing it
Allie Beth has almost a million followers on social media, and her “Relatable” podcast is wildly popular.
She is also a sought-after speaker who is currently getting $20,000 to $30,000 per speaking engagement.
She is also an author of two books.
The first, You’re Not Enough (And That’s Okay): Escaping the Toxic Culture of Self-Love, is a “framework for escaping our culture of trendy narcissism.”
Her second, Toxic Empathy: How Progressives Exploit Christian Compassion, was released October 15, 2024.
She is also a wife, and a mother to three daughters, as well as a devout Christian.
And she is also one of the most vocal conservative advocates for the pro-life cause.
So, it came as a shock to many to learn that Allie Beth Stuckey used to be pro-choice — but without realizing it.
“I’ve always considered myself pro-life. I just have known reflexively and because I was raised in a Christian household that abortion is wrong, that it’s killing a human being, and that that is wrong, but I also knew that there were these rare exceptions that I thought needed to happen sometimes,” Stuckey explains on “Relatable.”
“I posted something to that effect on Facebook; I guess maybe I just adopted the general Republican position that yes, abortion is wrong, should be illegal, but there’s rape, there’s incest, there’s fetal anomalies. And I thought that was a sophisticated, nuanced, but fully pro-life position,” she continues.
When Stuckey posted this to Facebook, someone replied in the comments asking her what the difference is between a baby conceived in rape and a baby not conceived in rape.
That one comment got Stuckey thinking.
Stopped me in my tracks
“That comment stopped me in my tracks,” she recalls. “I think that really had a big effect on how I started thinking about abortion, but I realized either in that moment or just over time that I was thinking about abortion, even as someone who called myself staunchly pro-life, as an abstract issue, as a political issue, and not from the perspective of the baby, and not really as murder.”
When she changed the way she was viewing and thinking about what she thought was just a “procedure,” she ultimately changed her mind.
“I wasn’t thinking about it in realistic, stark, terms, and that is that it murders a child and that the humanity of that person that’s being killed does not change based on the circumstances surrounding its conception,” she explains.
“I don’t know who that commenter was, but I’m thankful for them,” she continues, adding, “And you just never know how God is going to use your insistence upon speaking the truth in love.”
Pro-Life Press will keep you up-to-date on any new developments to this ongoing story.
